Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger going head-to-head with video game violence?

Sept. 17, 2010 | 11:35 a.m.

There’s something deliciously ironic about the idea of Arnold Schwarzenegger as the protector of pop culture against the blood-thirsty commandos, barbarians, killer robots and all the other heavily armed hordes in video games. This is, after all, the man who starred films that reeked of cordite and left behind a mountain of spent shell casings.

The fight really isn’t between the action-hero-turned politician and the video game industry — it just looks that way, thanks to the semantics of legal documents that refer to an ongoing California conflict, Schwarzenegger vs. EMA. Times staff writer Alex Pham recently summed up the points of the case nicely. In a nutshell, the fight centers over a 2005 state law banning the sale or rental of violent video games to minors. That law was ruled unconstitutional by a lower federal circuit court, but the decision was appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case Nov. 2.

Today, at our Company Town sister blog, Pham followed up with the news that the Washington-based Comic Book Legal Defense Fund has urged the high court to reject the law, saying it “would undermine more First Amendment principles in a single case than any decision in living memory.”

Charles Brownstein, executive director of CBLDF, used historical context to frame his organization’s argument: “The case California makes against video games is one familiar to the comic book industry, which was nearly destroyed by government attempts at regulation in the 1950s. Then, as now, moral crusaders claimed that popular new media containing depictions of violence were detrimental to our youth. Then, as now, pseudo-science was used to back such claims. Those claims weren’t true in the 1950s, and they aren’t true now. We hope that the Supreme Court denies California’s attempt to diminish the 1st Amendment and spares the video game industry the fate that was suffered by the comic book industry in the past. We also encourage them to deny California’s claims so that comic books and other media don’t suffer under a new constitutional standard that creates new categories of unprotected speech and diminishes the 1st Amendment rights of minors.”

– Geoff Boucher

RECENT AND RELATED

Sly: I got all ‘Jersey Shore’ when I met Arnold in 1977

Stallone: ‘I’m contemplating an ‘Expendables’ sequel’

Stallone: Velcro muscles killed the 1980s heroes

Ray Bradbury hates big government: We need a revolution

Stallone’s return: ‘I never thought I’d see Grauman’s again’

Jason Statham: ‘I want to be Daredevil’

ZEITCHIK: Hollywood ponders Schwarzenegger’s future

Can you guess which movie Sylvester Stallone says is his worst?

Photo: Arnold Schwarzenegger as visualized in one of the “Terminator” video games.

Comments


2 Responses to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger going head-to-head with video game violence?

  1. Dillon says:

    Sounds like a bunch of bull to me, maybe all these pathetic politicians should concentrate on REAL issues that face our society, like poverty, starvation, etc… Apparently they have nothing better to do than worry about how video games are hurting the public, and we(the public) need a bunch of wrinkly old bastards to tell us how we should live… In the words of my generation "eat my shorts".

  2. SkiTtLe says:

    Seriously?? Video games are already rated, that isn't enough? I don't think violent video games is the problem to todays "violence" and the money and energy spent on this could probably be used elsewhere. Besides, maybe these kind of regulations should be left to parents — not the state.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <pre> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis