‘The Thing': Mary Elizabeth Winstead on living up to John Carpenter’s legacy

Oct. 11, 2011 | 3:00 p.m.
maryewinstead The Thing: Mary Elizabeth Winstead on living up to John Carpenters legacy

"The Thing" star Mary Elizabeth Winstead said she found the opportunity to play a character who wasn’t overtly sexy, funny or ditsy to be refreshing. (Anne Cusack / Los Angeles Times)

The most frightening element of the 1982 John Carpenter horror classic “The Thing” is the title creature, a shape-shifting alien parasite brought to gruesome life with detailed practical effects. For actress Mary Elizabeth Winstead, the scariest part about starring in a new prequel to the film, also called “The Thing” and opening Friday, was the risk of not living up to a cult favorite.

“I think there was some pressure going into it knowing that we were going to be watched very closely and that if we didn’t do it justice, there was going to be a lot of anger,” Winstead said in Los Angeles.

the thing poster The Thing: Mary Elizabeth Winstead on living up to John Carpenters legacyBut the 26-year-old actress, known for her roles as a Hollywood starlet in Quentin Tarantino’s “Death Proof” and as the object of Michael Cera’s affection in “Scott Pilgrim vs. the World,” saw in “The Thing” a chance to do something different.

“I didn’t open the script and see a bunch of retreads of the same characters that are in the first film, who are so beloved,” said Winstead, a self-described fan of Carpenter’s film, which was itself inspired by 1951’s “The Thing From Another World.” “I saw a totally new story with new characters and new dynamics.”

Winstead plays Kate Lloyd, a Columbia University paleontologist enlisted to help excavate a mysterious creature frozen in ice near a Norwegian research station in Antarctica. It will surprise no one who has seen Carpenter’s film that the creature escapes, with disastrous results: The charred wreckage of the Norwegian camp is visited in the 1982 film by Kurt Russell’s wily helicopter pilot, MacReady.

The new “Thing,” set days before the Carpenter film, maintains the mythology and echoes some key scenes of its predecessor, but it also adds original elements. Chief among them is a female protagonist — there are no women in the 1982 cast — who is in many ways the opposite of Russell’s wisecracking hero.

“I kind of accepted the fact that she’s not funny,” Winstead said of Kate, for whom she drew inspiration from her oldest sister, a neurologist. “She’s very serious.… She’s very focused, she’s very intelligent.”

She also turns out to be handy with a flamethrower.

lsq1bop7 The Thing: Mary Elizabeth Winstead on living up to John Carpenters legacy

Mary Elizabeth Winstead in "The Thing." (Kerry Hayes / Universal Pictures)

Joel Edgerton, Winstead’s costar, said there was a conscious effort “not to try and make her some sort of glamour queen in the middle of this crazy, dirty, oily, ancient base station.”

Winstead found the opportunity to play a character who wasn’t overtly sexy, funny or ditsy to be refreshing. “I just don’t feel like that’s really representative of women as a whole,” she said. “This was the kind of role that to me was the kind of thing I was looking as a filmgoer to see on screen.”

“The Thing,” a Universal picture, also diverges from the typical studio playbook, with a first-time European director in Matthijs van Heijningen Jr., a cast lacking any real big names, and a number of scenes with Norwegian dialogue and English subtitles. Van Heijningen, who is Dutch and has a background in commercials, is a devout Carpenter fan (and an “Alien” disciple) and was adamant about maintaining the original film’s slow burn.

“Old horror-thriller movies, they always have a long buildup,” he said. “I really had to fight for that.”

lqr7slnc The Thing: Mary Elizabeth Winstead on living up to John Carpenters legacy

Mary Elizabeth Winstread and Ulrich Thomsen in a scene from "The Thing." (Universal Pictures)

The director tried to use practical effects as much as possible, though many scenes make use of computer-generated imagery. Winstead said she and her fellow cast members found it useful to have something tangible to act against other than a tennis ball on a stick or a guy in a neon-green bodysuit.

“It’s a real blend of practical and CGI,” she added. “It’s kind of representative of the film in the sense that it’s a blend of the old and the new.”

Like “The Thing,” which takes place in 1982, Winstead’s next project is another period piece, one whose audacious premise is given away in the title: “Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter,” due next year. In the film based on the book by Seth Grahame-Smith, who also wrote the screenplay, Winstead plays Mary Todd Lincoln, wife of Abraham Lincoln (Benjamin Walker), who in this universe slays vampires during his off-hours. Timur Bekmambetov (“Wanted”) is at the helm.

lqr7ubnc The Thing: Mary Elizabeth Winstead on living up to John Carpenters legacy

Mary Elizabeth Winstead in "The Thing." (Universal Pictures)

As with the novel, the film is deeply researched and plays its absurd hypothesis with a straight face. “It feels very real; it’s not very tongue-in-cheek or winky or anything like that,” Winstead said. “It’s really told as though this is the story of our country. It’s a lot of fun.”

Winstead is preparing for her role in “Smashed,” a small indie in which she plays an alcoholic teacher opposite Aaron Paul of the AMC series “Breaking Bad.” After that, it’s anyone’s guess what the Los Angeles-based actress will tackle, which suits her just fine.

“Whatever your last film was is usually how people see you,” Winstead said. “I try with every film to go in the opposite direction … so that nobody will ever be able to figure out exactly what I am.”

— Oliver Gettell


thing custom 1 fc fnlc v2 copy The Thing: Mary Elizabeth Winstead on living up to John Carpenters legacy‘The Thing’: Steve Niles talks horror, John Carpenter

‘Lincoln: Vampire Hunter’ stakes claim to greatness

Stephen King: ‘One of the best writers of all time’?

Splatter auteur Herschell Gordon Lewis: ‘I’m no artist’

‘Exorcist’ director lists the 13 scariest movies ever

Colin Farrell promises a ‘bad-ass’ vampire

‘FD5′: James Cameron’s No. 2 gets his shot

Wes Craven, back on the set with ‘Ghostface’

Romero on zombies: ‘The gift that keeps on giving’

Stephen King: Rowling is talented, Meyer can’t write


13 Responses to ‘The Thing': Mary Elizabeth Winstead on living up to John Carpenter’s legacy

  1. Herschel says:

    Because there are no NEW stories.

  2. lightdee says:

    really looking forward to this movie – sounds like the director is trying to stick with the "feel" of the carpenter film, which I think is smart.

  3. John says:

    Please let's give credit where credit is due. The Carpenter film was a remake. It was not the original. The original "Thing" was made in the 1950's. If an actress or reporter is going to comment, please know your facts.

  4. Bill says:

    Hello, what about the original original? Remember James Arness as the extra-terrestial carrot? We forget at our peril to "Watch the skies."

  5. Devin says:

    RE: Wikipedia "Ostensibly a remake of the classic 1951 Howard Hawks-Christian Nyby film The Thing from Another World, Carpenter's film is in fact an adaptation more faithful in its premise and characters to the novella Who Goes There? by John W. Campbell, Jr. which inspired the 1951 film, and not a remake in the conventional sense."

  6. kaiart says:

    This is a remake of he JC's Thing -bottom line. Nothing new. Hollywood capitalizing on unoriginal material. Easy way to make $$$/ Enough said.

  7. Jonathan says:

    Sadly, the new movies is a sloppy, poorly written film. The actors do a good job with what little they get and the directing of the film is adequate. While there are some moments of greatness in the film, it falls far from its mark. Such a shame. Wanted it to be a whole lot better.

  8. Americo Appachabelli says:

    lose the girl lead~

  9. hijk says:

    The 1982 film is the original, since it is based directly on the book and not the earlier film. This new film will suck as they are just trying to recreate the original and make it a chick flick at the same time.

    • seJ says:

      Those were my 1st thoughts exactly hijk. Russels gritty and witty "MacReady" character from the original will be super diffiCult to replace. I just might go out and see a matinee anywh0.

  10. DJM says:

    I have seen the newest 'Thing'. It is well done, spot on, not too much or too little. If you have not seen the Carpenter :'sequel' you might want to after seeing this one. And, I still enjoy the campy 50's one, too.

  11. Jewel says:

    I am a real and true fan of all the thing movies. Cant wait for the next THING

  12. CORRUPTION IS A CANCER SPREAD TO WORLD WIDE…… Anna Hazare is guiding us to the right path…… you deserve a salute sir…… you are inspiring a common man to fight against corruption….. you are motivating the YOUTH….. VANDE MATHARAM…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <pre> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis