‘The Wolverine’: Darren Aronofsky and failed arthouse heroes

March 18, 2011 | 11:21 a.m.

At 24 Frames, our must-read sister blog, Steven Zeitchik wonders if the great arthouse experiment is losing steam in superhero cinema.

darren aronofsky The Wolverine: Darren Aronofsky and failed arthouse heroes

Darren Aronofsky (Robyn Beck/AFP-Getty)

When Christopher Nolan’s Batman” movies became a massive critical and commercial success a few years ago, it touched off one of the more unexpected mini-trends in modern filmmaking. Suddenly quirky directors were being handed the reins to big-budget men-in-tights tentpoles, as studios looked to replicate the formula that had the director of “Memento” scoring with splashy movies about a caped crime-fighter.

wolverine1 The Wolverine: Darren Aronofsky and failed arthouse heroesIt was an arrangement that seemed to give everyone what they wanted. Studios gained credibility and the potential for a massive hit, while the auteurs got to play with a bigger budget and on a bigger stage without (they hoped) giving up much artistic freedom. Plus they got to make a greenlighted movie, which in this climate may be the biggest selling point of all.

But these experiments have hardly yielded magnificence and wondrousness. This week’s news that Darren Aronofsky wouldn’t direct “The Wolverine” is the latest example; most reports had Aronofsky leaving the project for family reasons, but it nonetheless marked another pairing that didn’t work out as planned.

Two years ago, Gavin Hood, the foreign-language Oscar-winner, didn’t hit it out of the park with “X-Men Origins: Wolverine.” “Superman” director Richard Donner was brought onto Hood’s set and may have even served as a helmer for part of the film, leaving Hood to defend his relationship with Fox executives in promotional interviews. The movie went on to perform only decently at the box office and underwhelmed a fair number of critics and fans.  The attempt by “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mindauteur Michel Gondry to give new life to “The Green Hornet” stumbled, too…


— Steven Zeitchik


x men first class serious The Wolverine: Darren Aronofsky and failed arthouse heroes

McAvoy: “First Class” is a…Butch and Sundance love story?

“First Class”: Singer dishes on Havok and Azazel

“First Class”: Report from stressed-out set

Patrick Stewart: My biggest  “X-Men” regret

January Jones nervous about sexy Frost suits

Vaughn: Hollywood is killing the hero genre

After “Inception,” Vaughn axes “Class” scene

Singer: It’s got to be about Xavier & Magneto


2 Responses to ‘The Wolverine’: Darren Aronofsky and failed arthouse heroes

  1. reddog says:

    the truth of it all. I think the real reason is because he didn't want to film in Japan with the danger of all the radioactivity in the northern part of the country. His crew has to live there for months. the danger of consuming the food, bathing and drinking the water was just too much I guess. who could blame him.

  2. Sophie says:

    I know nothing about the director Gavin Hood, but the Wolverine film was truly awful to watch, as an X-Men fan. They butchered the characters, the acting was tepid. Gambit, who can be a slippery or charismatic character in the comic books, was just a weakling in awe of Wolverine. Utterly boring. I'm not sure if it was the director's fault, but that was one movie I hated. Ryan Reynolds was great casting as Deadpool, but yes, they destroyed that character as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis