Ridley Scott rides with ‘Robin Hood’: ‘There’s a very strong destiny story in this’

May 07, 2010 | 1:09 p.m.

Ridley Scott is already talking about sequels to “Robin Hood,” and considering the compelling scenes from the May 14 release, he may be right to consider this a rich new territory for his cinematic plunder. John Horn has a preview of the film; this is a much longer version of his Sunday Calendar story on the movie and it’s accompanied by some new behind-the-scenes video.

Whatever you say about Russell Crowe’s up-with-people campaign against unresponsive, property-grabbing government in “Robin Hood,” don’t suggest to its makers that the historical epic is the first tea party movie. “No, no,” says screenwriter Brian Helgeland. “That would not be good.”

For all of its 12th century trappings, Helgeland and director Ridley Scott’s retelling of the mythical English archer story tries to be thematically contemporary. Rather than a steal-from-the rich yeoman, the film’s titular hero is a disillusioned war veteran just back from a distant, violent campaign against Muslims. “We wanted to tell the story of how the myth was created,” says producer Brian Grazer.

Robin Hood

Hood’s homeland is ruled by a king with little concern for his subjects, and somebody — maybe that guy who’s so good with bows and arrows? — needs to step up and take the country back. “There’s a very strong destiny story in this,” says Scott, who shot most of the film on British locations, including Sherwood Forest.

Hood and his merry men are far less interested in redistributing the wealth than in making sure King John (Oscar Isaac) focuses on the people in England. King John is in cahoots with a villainous adviser (Mark Strong’s Sir Godfrey purports to be English, but he’s as French as foie gras). “That’s where the heart of this Robin Hood is,” says Helgeland, whose credits include L.A. Confidential and A Knight’s Tale.” “He is trying to give the people a voice.”

But don’t expect Scott, whose Gladiator turned Crowe into a global, Oscar-winning star, to focus on shuttle diplomacy. The movie is filled with fighting, including a reverse D-Day landing by the French on England’s shores that casts Hood as a battlefield strategist in the mold of Eisenhower. “The biggest challenge,” Scott says of some of the film’s inventions, “is how can we be original? Because if you don’t, it becomes cliché.”

Even with so many horses and quivers and lances, “Robin Hood” also aims to have something for women. And that’s where Maid Marian (Cate Blanchett) comes in. Her husband has been killed and she might need someone to help around the house — maybe that guy who’s so good with bows and arrows? “You have to remember,” Scott says, “that you have to be romantic.”

“Robin Hood” had any number of starts and stops — once delayed by a screenwriters’ strike, and star Crowe, who had just played a portly journalist in State of Play,” needed to  get into fighting shape for his starring role. Originally set for release last November, “Robin Hood” will now premiere May 14 — one week after the behemoth “Iron Man 2.”

Ridley Scott on set of American Gagnster


Helgeland says he came onto the movie when Scott was looking for revisions to a screenplay by Ethan Reiff and Cyrus Voris (“Kung Fu Panda,” “Bulletproof Monk”) that had been much more focused as an old-fashioned “CSI” story about the Sheriff of Nottingham (the film’s original title was “Nottingham”) and less focused on Robin Longstride, as Crowe’s character is called in the finished film. (Played by “Price & Prejudice’sMatthew Macfadyen, the sheriff is scarcely in the movie now.)

Helgeland had written a script about Cortez called “The Serpent and the Eagle,” with Ron Howard penciled in to direct, but the wheels came off the project when Mel Gibson made “Apocalypto.” Apparently there was only so much room for a drama about the conquest.

“Ridley really liked it, but wasn’t ultimately interested in directing it,” Helgeland says of his Cortez screenplay. Specifically, Scott admired how Helgeland had taken a historical figure and brought him to life; he wanted Helgeland to do the same in “Robin Hood.”

“There’s a legendary DNA about Robin Hood that’s in everyone’s bones,” Scott says. “They know who he is.” The challenge, he says, was to reinvent the character — and who better to do that than Crowe, Scott’s star in “Gladiator,” “A Good Year,” “Body of Lies” and “American Gangster.”

“He likes to do accents,” Scott says of his frequent collaborator. “He likes to put on weight. He likes to lose weight. And I kind of like that passion.”

— John Horn


Blade Runner poster 2

Ridley Scott brings “Alien” and “Blade Runner” to L.A. June 13

Ridley Scott rolls dice on “Monopoly”

Ridley Scott takes Robin Hood beyond Sherwood

24 FRAMES: Will “Iron Man 2” flay “Robin Hood”?

Sigourney Weaver: “Outer space has been good to me”

No. 1 sci-fi woman? Ripley, believe it or not

Philip K. Dick scans the darkness near Disnelyand

Peter Jackson: Movie fans are “fed up with the lack of original ideas”

Christopher Nolan breaks silence on Superman and Batman 3

PHOTOS: Top, Russell Crowe in “Robin Hood” (Paramount Pictures); Ridley Scott on the set of “American Gangsters” in 2007 (David LeeUniversal Pictures)

Clicking on Green Links will take you to a third-party e-commerce site. These sites are not operated by the Los Angeles Times. The Times Editorial staff is not involved in any way with Green Links or with these third-party sites.


2 Responses to Ridley Scott rides with ‘Robin Hood’: ‘There’s a very strong destiny story in this’

  1. Conquistador says:

    Too bad Ridley passed on the Cortez screenplay to work on the 96th remake ( no apologies for the slight exaggeration ) of Robin Hood. The Conquest is a monumental historical event that has been rarely explored in film, especially compared to the murky mythology of Robin Hood that has never resulted in a satisfactory movie …

  2. eber hart says:

    Utterly pointless retread —from the talented Crowe and Scott —in 2010? —as the 60th Anniversary of the staggeringly, eerily rerlevant KOREAN WAR is, yet again,
    'mysteriously overlooked'?
    —$$$$trange, don't you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis